Speed of Results5.5
Quality of Ingredient7
Welcome to our review today of a product called Rilastil. The point of the review is to determine if it can produce the results consumers are seeking to get rid of their stretch marks. The manufacturer made the product as a treatment against stretch marks. The product has a creamy texture, making it suitable for prolonged massages. The product should prevent and contrast stretch marks, as well as nourish the skin deeply to make it more elastic and soft.
You will find 12 active ingredients in the product. Some of the active ingredients in the product are Propylene, Glycol, Cetyl Esters, Cetyl Alcohol, Paraffinum Liquidium and Polysorbate 60. These ingredients provide elasticity to the skin, as well as reduce the appearance of scars. You will also find Methylparaben, Fragrance and Carbomer in the product.
You should use the product at least once a day. The best time of the day to use it is at night. The manufacturer stated that you should massage a suitable amount of the product into the skin until completely absorbed.
The product is a 6.76-ounce tube that you can purchase from Amazon for $49. Considering the hefty price tag, we feel that the manufacturer should have offered a discount on the product. Unfortunately, that is not available. The manufacturer made the shipping of the product an extra expense.
Guarantee & Feedback
The consumer is vulnerable to losing his or her money since the manufacturer did not offer a money-back guarantee for the product. The manufacturer leaves out a guarantee when it is uncertain about the product’s results. The product has only a few testimonials. That means only a few consumers have purchased the product. When only a few consumers have purchased a product, it is a clear indication that the product is not popular amongst consumers, who most have chosen to avoid.
Our Conclusive Review About Rilastil
After reviewing the product, we have seen that the manufacturer made a product that does not produce consistent results. The product is incapable of producing consistent results, so the manufacturer excluded a money-back guarantee from the product. The product was made as a treatment against stretch marks. The product has a creamy texture, making it suitable for prolonged massages. The product should prevent and contrast stretch marks, as well as nourish the skin deeply to make it more elastic and soft. The manufacturer made the shipping of the product an additional expense that consumers will incur. Considering the product is expansive, we feel that the manufacturer should have offered a discount on the product. We have found cheaper products on the market that provide better results. A key flaw in the product is that it does not come with a money-back guarantee. That is necessary, especially since consumers have stated that the product does not produce results. We have seen that consumers can opt for better products on the market that offer a money-back guarantee and come with a discount.